Aspects of Life on the British Home Front

	Defiance and precautionary measures.
	This page: day-to-day life and conclusion.

TO PRINT THIS ARTICLE ... ... click on print-friendly pdf which opens in a new tab/window. To open PDFs you will need Acrobat Reader. Most computers will already have the Reader but if not there is a free download here

Make Do and Mend leaflet No 4 issued by the Board of Trade and donated to the Centre by Mrs M. Allin

The Blitz had brought further disruption for the nation's schoolchildren. Most schools had closed at the outbreak of war until shelters had been constructed. There had also been the disarray caused by evacuation, including the increased pressure on rural schools. Further change was occasioned by the loss of young male teachers to the forces. They were replaced by elderly retired teachers and also by an influx of women into the teaching profession.

Every effort was made to maintain educational standards. However, the rising class sizes and the shortage of teachers undoubtedly took their toll. Family life was, of course, greatly disrupted. Fathers were either away in the forces (some never to return) or so heavily occupied in essential war work that they had little time with their children. Many Mothers were also juggling family responsibilities with employment in industry.

For adult males, the War did not necessarily mean conscription into the armed services. Men working in crucial war industries often found that they were designated as in 'reserved occupations', whilst many skilled men, made unemployed in the 1930s, were redirected into the nation's factories. The deployment of the male workforce was overseen by the Ministry of Labour, under Ernest Bevin.

One of the most famous directives involved the mining industry. A balloting scheme was introduced whereby some young men, eligible for military service, were instead chosen to work in the mines - they became known as the 'Bevin boys'. Altogether 21,000 youths were compulsorily set to work in the pits, with a further 16,000 volunteering. These mostly seventeen-year-old lads were quickly trained, but only around a third ever became sufficiently skilled to work at the actual coalface, where the demand for labour was greatest.

Some men, however, were never at ease with their status as directed or reserved labour. They were irked at being denied the chance to fight the enemy alongside their contemporaries. Jack S. a miner from South Yorkshire, had been refused entry into the Navy, because mining was a reserved occupation. Frustrated, he ran away to Liverpool, hoping he could join the Merchant Navy. However, he was caught by the police and sent back to Yorkshire, where he had to face a pit tribunal:

I was tried ... for being away for ten weeks, and I was fined a pound and told if I did nothing wrong in a month I could have it back, and then I was tried at Doncaster Court ... I was bound over for two years ... because it was essential work. So it was like desertion ... I came out of the courthouse and said 'I still don't want to go down pit' but they forced us. I told the judge ... 'put me in the Army, I don't want no training. Send me overseas because I am that eager to go in the forces'.

The mobilisation of the female population was an important factor in the success of the British war effort. Over two million women were engaged in the war economy, meeting the increased demand for labour, as well as replacing men conscripted into the forces.

A range of employment options was now open to women. Barbara Davies wanted to be a nurse. However, her family could not afford to support her through the training. She was attracted into industry by the financial incentives, others were attracted to outdoor work. Betty Radley had always wanted to be in the fresh air and was determined to avoid factory employment. Consequently, she signed up for the Women's Timber Corps. She was based at the largest sawmill in the New Forest. The work involved loading timber into railway trucks and stripping the bark for telegraph poles. By the age of eighteen, she had been put in charge of the sawmill. She was now responsible for classifying the species of the felled trees and measuring their length and width. These measurements had to be converted into cubic feet and were used to calculate the sawyers' pay, as they were paid on a piece work basis.

Whilst the social mobility and change evidenced above were undeniable, we should be wary of exaggerating the impact. Undoubtedly, women gained from the wider employment opportunities that opened up, and a larger proportion stayed in work after 1945 than had done so after 1918, but this was probably a reflection of wider economic circumstances than evidence of a major shift in attitudes concerning women's position in the workforce. As in the First World War, employers and trade unions alike had viewed the influx of women as a temporary expedient.

Aside from their war work, women had also to continue with their domestic role, often with added household responsibilities, if their fathers and husbands were away in the forces. The War was a far from liberating experience for many women. Given these burdens, it is not surprising that many women were happy to be freed from their war employment in 1945. In any case, many subscribed to the view that they should make way for the returning men.

Easy to Make Slippers for the Whole Family, issued by the Board of Trade and donated to the Centre by Mrs M. Allin.

On the other hand, it is clear that a significant minority of women, particularly from the younger generation, felt that they should be allowed to remain in so-called male spheres of employment. The war years had brought some degree of social and financial independence for these young, single women.

As housewives and mothers, it was women too who faced the challenges of feeding and clothing the family, which arose following the introduction of rationing in January 1940. The first provisions to be rationed were sugar, butter and bacon. These were closely followed by cheese and eggs. Clothes were also rationed, giving rise to the Utility garments. Clothes rationing was based on a points scheme. For the Government, this had the flexibility of controlling demand for scarce items - the less available something became, the higher the points were set. At the same time, the system allowed for a degree of customer freedom, allowing people to use their allotted points as they saw fit. Petrol had been placed on ration three weeks after the War began. In 1942, the screw was tightened still further, with the abolition of the basic civilian petrol ration. The same year saw the addition of sweets, chocolate and soap to the growing list of rationed items. Certain goods were never rationed during the War years. These included bread, potatoes, tobacco and beer. However, the latter was watered down and its price inflated by excise duties. Coal was not placed on the ration, following a sustained campaign of Conservative led opposition to proposed schemes for fuel control.

Everyone had a ration book. There were green ones for babies, blue ones for children and buff ones for adults. Those who could afford it could, of course, seek to circumvent rationing by paying higher prices for goods on the black market. Lord Woolton, the Food Minister, was confident that, as a result of careful enforcement of the rules, the black market accounted for a small proportion of total supply. The so-called grey market of under the counter favouritism to selected customers was possibly more widespread.

The Dig for Victory campaign had been launched at the outbreak of the War, to encourage people to supplement their diets with homegrown produce. People dug up their lawns and turned them into vegetable plots. Spare land in parks and other public spaces was also turned over to agricultural use. Many people began keeping chickens and rabbits.

Paper was in short supply. Many comics stopped production and newspapers were greatly reduced in size. J. D. Bones found that his paper round got much easier as a consequence. The Ministry of Supply began an appeal for the public to donate old books, which could be pulped, with special committees established to ensure that no precious items were destroyed.

Information leaflets were issued by the Ministry of Food, including a war cookery leaflet on how cheese could be served in dishes for breakfast, lunch and dinner! The Ministry also employed food advisers. These were trained home economists, , whose role was to demonstrate ways in which interesting and nutritional meals could be made, despite the constraints of rationing In 1941, the Government had established British Restaurants. The purpose was to provide cheap and nutritious meals for the workforce, and they were usually located near to factories.

Although rationing was an inconvenience, it was generally popular. It was seen as a clear sign of the Government's commitment to running the War along fair lines. For many in the working classes, it also had the unintended benefit of providing a balanced diet that was healthier than the one they had known in pre-war years.

At the outbreak of war, places of entertainment, such as theatres and cinemas, were closed. However, they soon reopened. The cinema was the most popular form of entertainment for the working class, with films offering an escape from the War being the most popular. Dances and concerts, put on by organisations such as the YMCA, also offered welcome opportunities to socialise. The sporting calendar was, however, greatly reduced. Within the home, radio was the most important form of mass entertainment, with popular shows such as ITMA.

Ministry of food leaflet No. 2, 'Cooking White Fish'. Donated to the Centre by Mrs M. Allin.

Significant improvements took place in the working class standard of living, particularly for unskilled workers. The improving indices for infant and maternal mortality were a good indicator of this. Subsidised school meals and free milk for mothers and babies were introduced. Factory canteens also boosted adult diets. Widespread vaccination schemes were begun, when real fears arose about epidemics taking hold amongst those displaced by bombing. The industrial workforce also benefited from improved medical provision in the factories. Thus, there were significant social benefits, for the mass of the population, arising from the Total War experience.

Many Labour ministers, and politicians on the reformist wing of the Conservative Party, were determined to capitalise on this impetus to social reform. There is some debate on how far the War had created a new political consensus in Britain, but by 1945 it appeared unlikely that any post-war government would fail to implement a Welfare State of some kind. From 1942 onwards, the British people, no longer concerned with simply avoiding defeat, were looking to life after victory. The publication of the Beveridge Report added to the increasingly widespread view that state intervention, which had been so successful in wartime, should be harnessed for good in peacetime. The Labour Party was the clear political beneficiary of this public mood, the Conservatives being associated with the unemployment and perceived failures of the 1930s. The War had helped to tilt the political direction leftwards, resulting in the landslide victory for Labour in 1945. To many observers, both in Britain and abroad, this looked like ingratitude to Churchill. But, the public was rejecting his party, not the man himself. Indeed, some respondents to pollsters in 1945 made it clear that they would have happily kept Churchill as Prime Minister, so long as they could have a Labour Government.

As Malcolm Smith argues, in terms of visions of British society, the War had bequeathed two conflicting legacies: collectivism and Churchillian individualism. In 1945, collectivism appeared to be much the more powerful of the two. However, wartime propaganda probably exaggerated the extent of the national unity that had been forged in the war years. Certainly, Britons had come together in a common purpose to a degree that was unprecedented. But, the War had not overturned the social fabric of the nation - it had not created new communities. Indeed, victory itself had helped to reinforce many traditional attitudes and institutions. As the War faded into memory, the community spirit of those years rapidly faded with it. Viewed from the standpoint of 2002, it is perhaps individualism rather than collectivism that appears as the increasingly more dominant legacy.

Select Bibliography

• Paul Addison, The Road To 1945, Pimlico, London, 1994
• Corelli Barnett, The Audit of War, Macmillan, London, 1986
• Brian Brivati & Harriet Jones, What Difference Did The War Make?, Leicester University Press, London, 1993
• John Bourne, Peter Liddle & Ian Whitehead (eds), The Great World War, Volume 2, HarperCollins, London, 2001
• Angus Calder, The People's War, The Literary Guild, London, 1969
• Angus Calder, The Myth of the Blitz, Pimlico, London, 1991
• Steven Fielding, Peter Thompson & Nick Tiratsoo, England Arise, MUP, Manchester, 1995

Article by Ian Whitehead.

	Defiance and precautionary measures.
	This page: day-to-day life and conclusion.